|
"Scientology III"
by L.
J. West, M.D.
originally printed in "The
Southern California Psychiatrist," October 1991, pp. 13-15.
Dr. West has granted permission to upload this article to computer networks
and bulletin boards
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In previous articles in this newspaper (July, 1990 and May, 1991), I described
how the Church of Scientology strives constantly to gain the appearance of respectability
and to attract new members, as well as to discredit its critics. What follows
is a continuation of that account, with special emphasis on Scientology's front
groups, the purposes of which are to improve its credibility with the public,
and to create new avenues for recruitment of members and generation of income.
L. Ron Hubbard long believed that celebrities could be useful in helping to
promote Scientology. He dictated special efforts to recruit the most viable and
successful people. In the 1950s Scientology tried unsuccessfully to recruit such
public figures as Marlene, Dietrich, Edward R. Murrow, Ernest Hemingway, Greta
Garbo and Howard Hughes. Finally in the 1970s the actor John Travolta and the
football star John Brodie credited their success to Scientology. Since then other
performers such as Tom Cruise and Kirstie Alley have publicly praised the Church.
A network of "celebrity centres" has been established to gather and
to help in the recruitment of new members. The most famous of these is Hollywood's
Celebrity Centre International, formerly the Manor Hotel, an enormous and magnificent
mansion built in the 1920s.
One of Scientology's latter-day developments has been its putative detoxification
procedure, called "the purification rundown." Within Scientology proper
it is employed along with the continual "dianetic" psychotherapy procedures
as a health enhancement process. By Narconon (Scientology's drug rehabilitation
front group) this is called "the Hubbard method." It is supposed to
dislodge toxins and drugs from fatty tissues through a rigorous regimen of exercise,
saunas (up to five hours a day, for up to 30 days), and progressively larger doses
of various vitamins. There is no scientific basis for the claims about it. In
fact, a noted in the previous article, the prolonged saunas can cause serious
dehydration, and the high doses of certain vitamins may also pose a health hazard.
Nevertheless, the Los Angeles-based Scientology front organization named "The
Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Education" (FASE), sponsors
"scientific" studies (which are mostly conducted by Seismologists and/or
Foundation officers) that predictably validate the Hubbard method. One beneficiary
of FASE is the HealthMed Clinic, which is also run by Scientologists, and which
administers the Hubbard treatment from its offices in Los Angeles and Sacramento.
By using FASE-sponsored research findings to legitimate its treatment, HealthMed
is able to attract new clients and thus carry out more "studies," to
generate more income, and to steer more people into various Scientology courses
from which still more money is harvested.
There are a number of other "front" enterprises through which the
Church of Scientology attempts to gain influence in society, and even in the health-professional
and scientific communities. For example, a branch of Scientology know as WISE
(World Institute of Scientology Enterprises) has been pushing selected Scientologists
to serve as "management consultants" to various professional entities.
The plan calls for these consultants to promote the "management training
techniques" of L. Ron Hubbard, and of course at the same time to recruit
new members. This is done first by distributing a Scientology personality test
(which inevitably detects major personality flaws) to businessmen and their employees,
and later by encouraging clients to purchase progressively expensive Scientology
courses that will correct those flaws.
Two such management consulting firms are located in the Los Angeles area.
One, called The Advisory, operates out of Burbank. Its head, Arthur J. Maren,
is also one of Scientology's three signatories on Narconon's Articles of Incorporation.
The Advisory solicits physicians through advertisements mailed to their offices,
with mailing labels purchased from the Los Angeles County Medical Association.
The other (and much larger) company is called Sterling Management Systems. Sterling
targets dentists, optometrists, podiatrists, physicians, veterinarians and other
health care professionals. Its main offices are in Glendale, but it reaches nationwide
through attractively packaged seminars and mailings of expensive brochures. It
has been expanding rapidly. A recent issue of the Los Angeles Business Journal
ranked Sterling among the 35 largest management consulting firms in Los Angeles
County. Sterling distributes slick promotional materials to health care professionals
in private practice, such as "Today's Professional: the Journal of Successful
Practice Management," which contains (inter alia) articles by Hubbard excerpted
from Scientology documents.
Sterling was founded in 1983 by a Scientologist Gregory K. Hughes, a
dentist in Vacaville, California. Dr. Hughes presents himself at "Winning
With Dentistry" seminars as an example of how well the Hubbard method
works. He doesn't discuss the fact that a number of lawsuits have been brought
against him and his dental associates by former patients charging them with
negligence and malpractice, or that he has been under investigation by the
California Board of Dental Examiners.
Sterling begins by offering a three-hour introductory seminar to members of
various health care professions in localities across the nation. At these seminars,
attendees receive the basic "management" advice and are strongly encouraged
to sign up (along with their spouses) for a week-long array (at a cost of $12,000
- $14,000) of courses at Sterling's California facility. The program consists
of daily 12-hour sessions (including the Communication Course, an entry level
course in Scientology) and a menu of self-taught courses from which to select.
Clients are pressured to discuss their personal lives. Personal information divulged
during auditing sessions has been used later to pressure clients into paying additional
money. Pressure is also exerted on clients to enrol in dianetic auditing courses
(starting at $3,000) aimed at correcting the problems inevitably revealed by the
personality test, and to purchase Scientology text-books, framed prints of text
from Hubbard's science fiction novels ($2,000) and $800 scheduling system, and
other items. The additional courses can cost as much as $5,000 to $18,000 a piece,
and the books can cost several hundred dollars. A case in point follow.
Dr. and Mrs. Robert Geary, a dentist and his wife from Ohio, claim that during
a five month period in 1988 they paid Scientology $200,000. Under constant pressure
in the context of a Sterling program, the couple was unable to resist signing
checks and arranging for loans to pay for additional seminars. When Dr. Geary
tried to break away, Scientologists allegedly kidnapped his wife and held her
for two weeks while supposedly helping her to become a "Clear" (a Scientology
term for someone without any remaining "engrams" or psychological problems).
When Scientology officials refused to give Dr. Geary information about his wife
or her whereabouts, he contacted the family lawyer, who promptly called the FBI
in Ohio and California. Within a day Mrs. Geary was returned home, but she was
"a physical and emotional wreck." The Gearys are now warning fellow
professionals to stay away from Sterling and Scientology. Other traumatized victims
of Sterling are also beginning to speak out about their experiences, and to warn
of the harms and costs that are never imagined at the outset.
Interest in Scientology has recently been whetted by cover stories in TIME
(May 6, 1991) and other periodicals such as CALIFORNIA magazine (June, 1991).
However, the cult reacts by greatly increasing its expenditures on public relations
and advertising, with full-page ads in USA Today and costly television commercials.
As a psychiatrist who has for many years studied the practices of totalist
cults, and noted the often harmful effects of these depredations upon cult members
and their families, I continue to observe the actions of the Church of Scientology
to recruit new members, silence critics, and gain political and economic influence
through deliberate deception, misinformation, concealment, distraction, and harassment.
It seems to me that there should be potent social and legal remedies to combat
the Church of Scientology, deriving both from the recent evolution of a consumer
protection tradition (as exemplified in the health field) and from the older legal
matrix of redress for damages and civil wrongs.
Our laws and codes of ethics accept the vulnerability of people to intimidation
and deception. They also accept the possibility that relationships of special
trust (such as those enjoyed by physicians, nurses, psychologists, social workers,
attorneys, ministers, etc.) may be improperly exploited. Disillusioned and damaged
"consumers" of the Hubbard method should be able to sue not only the
Church of Scientology but also Narconon, Sterling Management, and other Scientology
front organizations for damages done and losses endured. Of course, in order to
win a recovery for such damages or losses, plaintiffs must develop proof, which
necessarily requires investigations, witnesses and courtroom procedures. Nevertheless,
if proof is forthcoming, then such lawsuits should lead to recovery of damages
from which Scientology's claims of exemption as a religion should not make it
immune. Ten years ago such suits were very rare. Recently, however, they are on
the increase, and some have been successful. Needless to say, Scientology's efforts
to discredit expert witnesses for plaintiffs in these cases have been vicious
in the extreme.
If lawsuits of this type increasingly lead to recovery of damages, the harms
done by Scientology may begin to subside, as victims and their families are provided
greater protection under the law. Unfortunately, it is often extremely difficult
for people thus damaged to initiate tort actions. However, on behalf of those
few who do seek legal remedies, and also on behalf of their families, and also
on behalf of all those still in bondage, or not yet recruited but currently exposed
to risk, I hope that the legitimacy of such legal sanctions will increasingly
be affirmed by the courts with the help of knowledgeable experts from the health-related
professions. Progress in this field depends heavily on the prospect that psychiatrists
and other mental health workers will take a greater interest in the psychopathology
and psychotherapy of cult victims, as these unfortunate people and their families
increasingly turn to us for help.
|