| The Decision in Scientology v. Armstrong
LA Superior Court Case No. C420153
(excerpts)
In 1970 a police agency of the French Government conducted an investigation
into Scientology and concluded, "this sect, under the pretext of 'freeing
humans' is nothing in reality but a vast enterprise to extract the maximum
amount of money from its adepts by (use of) pseudo-scientific theories, by (use
of) 'auditions' and 'stage settings' (lit. to 'create a theatrical scene') pushed
to extremes (a machine to detect lies, its own particular phraseology . . ), to
estrange adepts from their families and to exercise a kind of blackmail against
persons who do not wish to continue with this sect." From the evidence presented
to this court in 1984, at the very least, similar conclusions can be drawn.
In addition to violating and abusing its own members civil rights, the organization
over the years with its "Fair Game"
doctrine has harassed and abused those persons not in the Church whom it perceives
as enemies.
The organization clearly is schizophrenic and paranoid, and this bizarre combination
seems to be a reflection of its founder LRH. The evidence portrays a man who has
been virtually a pathological liar when it comes to his history, background, and
achievements. The writings and documents in evidence additionally reflect his
egoism, greed, avarice, lust for power, and vindictiveness and aggressiveness
against persons perceived by him to be disloyal or hostile. At the same time it
appears that he is charismatic and highly capable of motivating, organizing, controlling,
manipulating, and inspiring his adherents. He has been referred to during the
trial as a "genius," a "revered person," a man who was "
viewed by his followers in awe." Obviously, he is and has been a very complex
person, and that complexity is further reflected in his alter ego, the Church
of Scientology.
[...]
On February 18, 1982, the Church of Scientology International issued a "
Suppressive Person
Declare Gerry Armstrong," which is an official Scientology document issued
against individuals who are considered as enemies of the Organization. Said Suppressive
Person Declare charged that Defendant Armstrong had taken an unauthorized leave
and that he was spreading destructive rumors about Senior Scientologists.
Defendant Armstrong was unaware of said Suppressive Person Declare until April
of 1982. At that time a revised Declare was issued
on April 22, 1982. Said Declare charged Defendant Armstrong with 18 different
"Crimes and High Crimes and Suppressive Acts Against the Church." The
charges included theft, juggling accounts, obtaining loans on money under false
pretenses, promulgating false information about the Church, its founder, and members,
and other untruthful allegations designed to make Defendant Armstrong an appropriate
subject of the Scientology "Fair Game Doctrine." Said Doctrine allows
any suppressive person to be "tricked, cheated, lied to, sued, or destroyed." |