HCOB: Sec Checker Form

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 AUGUST 1985¹

Remimeo
False Purpose RD Auditors and C/Ses
Tech/Qual
MAAs/Ethics Offs

False Purpose Rundown Series 10-J

SEC CHECKER FORM

Refs:
HCOB 5 June 84R FPRD Series 1R Rev.11.1.90 FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN
HCOB 9 June 84R FPRD Series 5R Rev.3.5.85 AUDITING THE FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN
HCOB 11 June 84 FPRD Series 7 C/Sing THE FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN
HCOB 1 Mar. 77 III FORMULATING CONFESSIONAL QUESTIONS
HCOB 1 Mar. 77 II CONFESSIONAL FORMS
HCOB 8 Mar. 62 THE BAD “AUDITOR”
HCOB 15 Mar. 62 SUPPRESSORS

This form is for use in auditing the False Purpose Rundown on Sec Checkers, particularly those who have had difficulty with their pcs and aren’t rapidly straightening out with Qual corrective actions and ethics.

It is not mandatory that a person be audited on any other False Purpose Rundown form prior to receiving this one. However, in doing a full, extensive cleanup and overhaul of a flubbing Sec Checker one would optimumly do the False Purpose RD Basic Form (HCOB 14 June 84, False Purpose RD Series 10-A) and Auditor Form (HCOB 17 May 85, False Purpose RD Series 10-H), followed by this form.

This list may have questions added to it by the C/S, but questions are not deleted from it in any case.

It may only be delivered by a fully qualified Hubbard False Purpose Rundown Auditor who has a proven record of auditing the False Purpose Rundown successfully.

AUDITOR INSTRUCTIONS

The auditor does the whole form on the pc, starting with the Section I questions and proceeding on through to the end of the Section II questions. Every question is cleared and checked on the meter.

Reading questions on this list are handled with False Purpose Rundown procedure.

Questions in Section I of this form ask for overts, which are handled with Steps A through G of the False Purpose Rundown procedure.

Questions in Section II ask directly for evil purposes and destructive intentions, and are handled using Steps C through G of False Purpose Rundown procedure.

SECTION I QUESTIONS:

1. AS A SEC CHECKER, HAVE YOU EVER REFUSED TO HEAR OR FIND OUT ABOUT A PARTICULAR TYPE OF OVERT?
(Do the following:

a. Find out what type of overt it was, and ask him if he has ever committed such an overt. If reading, pull it to F/N with Sec Checking procedure.
b. Handle the overt of “refusing to hear or find out about a particular type of overt” with Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure.
c. Recheck the original question, #1.)

2. HAVE YOU EVER NOT PULLED THE MISSED WITHHOLDS OF A NATTERY PC BECAUSE YOU AGREED WITH HIS NATTER?
(Do the following:

a. Find out what the subject of the natter was, and ask him if he has ever committed an overt on that subject. If reading, pull it to F/N with Sec Checking procedure.
b. Handle the overt of “not pulling the missed withholds of a nattery pc because you agreed with his natter” with Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure.
c. Recheck the original question, #2.)

3. HAVE YOU EVER IGNORED OR BEEN REASONABLE WITH A PC WHO WAS CRITICAL?
(Do the following:

a. Find out what the subject being criticized was, and ask him if he has ever committed an overt on that subject. If reading, pull it to F/N with Sec Checking procedure.
b. Handle the overt of “ignoring or being reasonable with a pc who was critical” with Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure.
c. Recheck the original question, #3.)

4. AS A SEC CHECKER HAVE YOU EVER IGNORED OR NEGLECTED A VALID INSTANT READ ON A SEC CHECK QUESTION?

5. HAVE YOU EVER NOT PULLED AN OVERT OR W/H BECAUSE YOU DIDN’T WANT TO KNOW ABOUT IT?
(Do the following:

a. Find out what the subject of the O/W was, and ask him if he has ever committed an overt on that subject. If reading, pull it to F/N with Sec Checking procedure.
b. Handle the overt of “not pulling a pc’s overt or W/H because you didn’t want to know about it” with Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure.
c. Recheck the original question, #5.)

6. HAVE YOU EVER IGNORED A DIRTY NEEDLE?

7. HAVE YOU EVER SEEN AN INSTANT READ ON A SEC CHECK QUESTION BUT DECIDED NOT TO TAKE IT UP?
(Do the following:

a. Take the Sec Check question that he had decided not to take up on his pc, and ask him that question. If reading, pull the W/H to F/N with Sec Checking procedure.
b. Handle the overt of “not taking up an instant read on a Sec Check question” with Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure.
c. Recheck the original question, #7.)

8. HAVE YOU EVER ACCEPTED A GENERALITY AS AN ANSWER FROM THE PC ON A SEC CHECK?

9. HAVE YOU EVER QUICKIED A SEC CHECK ON SOMEONE?

10. HAVE YOU EVER Q-AND-Aed IN A SEC CHECK?

11. ARE THERE ANY PCs YOU HAVE SEC CHECKED YOU STILL HAVE ATTENTION ON?
(Do the following:

a. Find out the name of the pc.
b. Ask “Have you committed any out-tech on [pc name]?” and handle fully as per Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure.
c. Repeat [b] on any other names the pc gave.
d. Recheck the original question, #11.)

12. IN WRITING SEC CHECK WORKSHEETS OR A SESSION KNOWLEDGE REPORT, HAVE YOU EVER NOT WRITTEN SOMETHING DOWN OR MADE IT LOOK LIKE LESS OF AN OVERT THAN IT WAS?
(Do the following:

a. Find out what the overt was that was being handled, and ask him if he, himself, has ever committed such an overt. If reading, pull it to F/N with Sec Checking procedure.
b. Handle the overt of “not writing something down or making an overt look like less of an overt than it was, in Sec Check worksheets or session Knowledge Reports” with Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure.
c. Recheck the original question, #12.)

13. HAVE YOU EVER EXAGGERATED A PC’S OVERTS IN THE WORKSHEETS OR IN A KNOWLEDGE REPORT TO MAKE HIS OVERTS LOOK WORSE THAN THEY WERE?
(Do the following:

a. Find out what the overt was that was being handled, and ask him if he, himself, has ever committed such an overt. If reading, pull it to F/N with Sec Checking procedure.
b. Handle the overt of “exaggerating a pc’s overts in worksheets or a Knowledge Report to make the pc’s overts look worse than they were” with Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure.
c. Recheck the original question, #13.)

14. HAVE YOU EVER PREVENTED ANOTHER FROM PERCEIVING SOMETHING?

15. HAVE YOU EVER SUPPRESSED SOMETHING FROM BEING FOUND OUT?

16. AS A SEC CHECKER HAVE YOU EVER MADE IT UNSAFE FOR A PC TO REVEAL SOMETHING?

17. WHILE SEC CHECKING ANOTHER DID AN OVERT OF YOUR OWN GET MISSED?

18. HAVE YOU AND A PC EVER SHARED A MUTUAL SECRET THAT YOU DIDN’T WANT KNOWN?

19. HAVE YOU EVER ASSISTED A PRECLEAR IN HIDING SOMETHING?

20. IN A SEC CHECK HAVE YOU EVER ACCEPTED MOTIVATORS OR NATTER INSTEAD OF PULLING WHAT THE PC DID?

21. HAVE YOU EVER REFUSED TO DO A SEC CHECK BECAUSE YOU WERE AFRAID YOU WOULD GET INTO TROUBLE IF YOU MISSED A W/H?

22. HAVE YOU EVER LET A PC GET AWAY WITH GETTING OFF SOMEBODY ELSE’S OVERT?
(Do the following:

a. Find out what the subject of the overt was, and ask him if he has ever committed an overt on that subject. If reading, pull it to F/N with Sec Checking procedure.
b. Handle the overt “letting a pc get away with getting off somebody else’s overt” with Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure.
c. Recheck the original question, #22.)

23. HAVE YOU EVER NOT PULLED A PC’S W/H WHEN HE WAS BITTERLY CRITICAL OF SOMEONE OR SOMETHING, BECAUSE YOU KNEW THE COMPLAINTS WERE TRUE? (Ref: HCOB 3 May 62R, ARC BREAKS, MISSED WITHHOLDS)

24. IS THERE ANYTHING ABOUT SEC CHECKS YOU HAVE DELIVERED YOU WOULD NOT WANT LRH TO KNOW ABOUT?

25. IS THERE ANYTHING ABOUT SEC CHECKS YOU HAVE DONE THAT YOU WOULD NOT WANT THE C/S TO KNOW ABOUT?

26. HAVE YOU EVER BACKED OFF FROM SEC CHECKING AN EXEC OR SENIOR TECH TERMINAL?

27. HAVE YOU EVER DELIBERATELY MESSED SOMEONE UP WHILE SEC CHECKING THEM?

28. DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER OVERTS OF OMISSION AS A SEC CHECKER?

29. HAVE YOU EVER DONE SOMETHING SQUIRREL AND CALLED IT “SEC CHECKING”?

30. DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER OVERTS OF COMMISSION AS A SEC CHECKER?

31. HAVE YOU EVER KNOWINGLY TRIED TO CAVE SOMEBODY IN, UNDER THE GUISE OF “DOING A SEC CHECK”?

32. HAVE YOU EVER ABUSED OR MISUSED THE TECH OF SEC CHECKING?

33. HAVE YOU EVER USED SEC CHECKING TECH TO OVERWHELM ANOTHER?

SECTION II QUESTIONS:

34. AS A SEC CHECKER, DO YOU HAVE AN EVIL PURPOSE?

35. HAVE YOU HAD AN INTENTION TO WRECK A PC’S CASE BY MISAPPLYING SEC CHECKING TECH?

36. HAVE YOU EVER INTENDED TO COVER SOMETHING UP THROUGH MISAPPLICATION OF SEC CHECKING?

37. DO YOU FEEL THERE ARE CERTAIN AREAS OF A PC’S LIFE WHICH ARE NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS?

38. DO YOU FEEL THERE IS ANYTHING WRONG WITH INVADING A PRECLEAR’S PRIVACY?

39. HAVE YOU HAD A CONSIDERATION THAT THERE ARE SOME THINGS IT WOULD BE DANGEROUS FOR ANOTHER TO REVEAL?

40. WHEN SEC CHECKING OR PULLING O/Ws ON SOMEONE, ARE THERE ANY AREAS YOU FEEL EMBARRASSED ASKING ABOUT OR DELVING INTO?
(Do the following:

a. Find out what the subject or subjects are. If more than one, note the read on each as the pc gives it. Take the longest reading subject and ask him if he has ever committed an overt on that subject. If reading, pull it to F/N with Sec Checking procedure. Handle any other reading subjects in the same way.
b. Handle the consideration of “feeling embarrassed asking about or delving into certain areas when sec checking or pulling someone’s O/Ws” with Steps C to G of False Purpose RD procedure.
c. Recheck the original question, #40.)

41. HAVE YOU EVER HAD AN IMPULSE TO KEEP ANOTHER FROM FINDING OUT?

42. HAVE YOU EVER INTENDED TO PREVENT A DISCOVERY?

43. HAVE YOU EVER WANTED A PC TO BE LEFT WITH A MISSED WITHHOLD?

END RUDS:

(Session withholds are handled with usual withhold rudiment procedure. Undisclosed overts missed in doing the questions on the list are handled with Steps A-G of False Purpose RD procedure.)

1. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU TOLD A HALF-TRUTH?

2. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU TOLD AN UNTRUTH?

3. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU SAID SOMETHING ONLY TO IMPRESS ME?

4. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU TRIED TO DAMAGE SOMEONE?

5. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU DELIBERATELY TRIED TO INFLUENCE THE E-METER?

6. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU SUCCESSFULLY WITHHELD SOMETHING?

7. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU COVERED UP FOR SOMEONE ELSE?

8. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAS ANYONE SAID YOU HAD A WITHHOLD WHEN YOU DIDN’T HAVE ONE?

9. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAS ANYTHING BEEN ASSERTED?

10. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAS ANYTHING BEEN SUPPRESSED?

11. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAS ANYTHING BEEN INVALIDATED?

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

Hubbard, L. R. (1985, 20 August). Sec Checker Form. The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology. (1991 ed., Vol. XII, pp. 58-64.). Los Angeles: Bridge Publications, Inc.

Notes