HCOB: False Purpose Rundown Executive Posting Qualifications Form

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 MAY 1988R¹
REVISED 19 JUNE 1989

Remimeo
False Purpose RD Auditors and C/Ses
Tech/Qual
HCO

False Purpose Rundown Series 10 -L

FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN EXECUTIVE POSTING QUALIFICATIONS FORM

Refs:
HCOB 5 June 84 FPRD Series 1 FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN
HCOB 9 June 84R Rev. 3.5.85  FPRD Series 5R AUDITING THE FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN
HCOB 11 June 84 FPRD Series 7 C/Sing THE FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN
HCOB 1 Mar. 77 III FORMULATING CONFESSIONAL QUESTIONS
HCOB 1 Mar. 77 II CONFESSIONAL FORMS
HCO PL 28 Mar. 84 II Exec Series 40 EXECUTIVE POSTING QUALIFICATIONS

This form is used on any person being proposed for executive posting in a Scientology organization, per HCO PL 28 Mar. 84 II, Exec Series 40, EXECUTIVE POSTING QUALIFICATIONS.

It is not mandatory that a person be audited on any other False Purpose Rundown form prior to receiving this one.

This list may have questions added to it by the C/S where needed. For example, the C/S may add questions to Section I pertaining specifically to the person’s post and duties. (Refs: HCOB 1 Mar. 77 III, FORMULATING CONFESSIONAL QUESTIONS, and HCOB 1 Mar. 77 II, CONFESSIONAL FORMS)

The form may only be delivered by a trained and qualified Hubbard False Purpose Rundown Auditor. All False Purpose Rundown HCOBs apply in delivering this form, i.e., the pc must be standardly set up to receive the action, etc.

USE OF OTHER FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN FORMS

While the C/S may, at his discretion, require that a person receive another False Purpose Rundown form or forms in order to fulfill executive posting qualifications, this is the only form which is specifically required for this purpose. The pc can be given other forms as part of a full False Purpose Rundown pc program. (Refs: HCOB 11 June 84, FPRD Series 7, C/Sing THE FALSE PURPOSE RUNDOWN, and HCO PL 28 Mar. 84 II, Exec Series 40, EXECUTIVE POSTING QUALIFICATIONS)

AUDITOR INSTRUCTIONS

The auditor does the whole form on the pc, starting with the Section I questions and proceeding on through to the end of the Section II questions. Every question is cleared and checked on the meter.

Reading questions on this list are handled with False Purpose Rundown procedure.

Questions in Section I of this form ask for overts, which are handled with Steps A through G of the False Purpose Rundown procedure.

Questions in Section II ask directly for evil purposes, destructive intentions and false considerations, and are handled using Steps C through G of False Purpose Rundown procedure.

SECTION I QUESTIONS:

1. HAVE YOU HAD A BACK-OFF ON HANDLING SOME AREA OF YOUR POST?
(Find which area he has a back-off on handling, get when it started and then pull the prior overt. Handle that overt per Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure. Then check for and handle any other such prior overt. When these have been handled, recheck the original question, #1.)

2. HAVE YOU HAD A BACK-OFF ON HANDLING SOME JUNIOR?
(Find which junior he has a back-off on handling, get when it started and then pull the prior overt. Handle that overt per Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure. Then check for and handle any other such prior overt. When these have been handled, recheck the original question, #2.)

3. HAS THERE BEEN SOME SITUATION YOU SHOULD HAVE HANDLED, BUT INSTEAD WERE “REASONABLE” ABOUT?
(Find what the situation was, get when it started and then pull the prior overt. Handle that overt per Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure. Then check for and handle any other such prior overt. When these have been handled, recheck the original question, #3.)

4. IS THERE SOME DEPARTMENT OR AREA YOU HAVE TENDED TO NEGLECT OR NOT-IS?
(Find the department or area, get when the neglect or not-is started and then pull the prior overt. Handle that overt per Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure. Then check for and handle any other such prior overt. When these have been handled, recheck the original question, #4.)

5. HAVE YOU COMMITTED AN OVERT ON A SENIOR?

6. HAVE YOU COMMITTED AN OVERT ON ANOTHER STAFF MEMBER?

7. HAVE YOU COMMITTED AN OVERT ON A PUBLIC SCIENTOLOGIST?

8. HAVE YOU COMMITTED AN OVERT ON A SCIENTOLOGY ORGANIZATION?

9. IS THERE SOME OVERT ACT YOU’VE HAD TO RESTRAIN YOURSELF FROM COMMITTING?

10. IS THERE SOMETHING YOU HAVE DONE YOU HAVE SUCCESSFULLY WITHHELD IN AUDITING OR SEC CHECKING?

11. DO YOU HAVE A SECRET OVERT?

12. HAVE YOU DONE SOMETHING YOU COULD GET INTO SERIOUS TROUBLE FOR?

13. HAVE YOU DONE SOMETHING YOU THINK MIGHT GET YOU REMOVED FROM YOUR POST OR ORG, IF IT WERE KNOWN?

14. HAVE YOU DONE SOMETHING TO MAKE YOUR GROUP OR ORGANIZATION LOSE?

15. AS A STAFF MEMBER, HAVE YOU EVER COMPROMISED YOUR INTEGRITY?

16. HAVE YOU QUICKIED OR DONE A BRUSH-OFF JOB OF SOMETHING?

17. HAVE YOU EVER JUST PRETENDED TO DO A POST?

18. HAVE YOU BEEN IDLE, LOAFED OR GOOFED OFF ON POST?

19. HAVE YOU EVER ACCEPTED PAY OR OTHER SUPPORT AS A STAFF MEMBER WHEN YOU WERE PRODUCING NO OR FEW EXCHANGEABLE PRODUCTS?

20. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN INVOLVED WITH OR CONDONED A CRIMINAL POSTING?

21. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO PUT ETHICS IN ON A JUNIOR?

22. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO UPHOLD OR SET AN EXAMPLE OF HIGH ETHICAL STANDARDS?

23. HAVE YOU ENCOURAGED ANOTHER TO BE OUT-ETHICS?

24. HAVE YOU DONE SOMETHING OUT-ETHICS?

25. HAVE YOU EVER DELIBERATELY MISAPPLIED ETHICS OR JUSTICE?

26. HAVE YOU EVER WANTED TO LEAVE STAFF?
(Find out when this was and check for an overt committed against the group prior to wanting to leave. Handle that overt per Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure. Then check for and handle any other such prior overt. When these have been handled, recheck the original question, #26.)

27. HAVE YOU KNOWINGLY GONE BY MISUNDERSTOODS?

28. HAVE YOU EVER SUGGESTED OR ORDERED AN LRH HCOB OR HCO PL NOT BE FOLLOWED?

29. HAVE YOU EVER GIVEN OUT DATA WHICH WAS CONTRARY TO HCO BULLETINS OR POLICY LETTERS?

30. HAVE YOU KNOWINGLY VIOLATED LRH POLICY?

31. HAVE YOU ALTERED LRH TECH?

32. HAVE YOU EVER DELIBERATELY NONCOMPLIED WITH A LEGAL ORDER?

33. HAVE YOU DONE ANYTHING TO MAKE A SENIOR OR MANAGEMENT WRONG?

34. HAVE YOU BACKFLASHED OR BEEN DISCOURTEOUS TO A SENIOR?

35. HAVE YOU EVER DELIBERATELY CRASHED YOUR STATS IN ORDER TO MAKE SOMEBODY WRONG?

36. HAVE YOU INDULGED IN CASE ON POST?

37. HAVE YOU EVER KNOWINGLY CARRIED OUT AN ILLEGAL OR DESTRUCTIVE ORDER?

38. HAVE YOU ISSUED AN ILLEGAL OR DESTRUCTIVE ORDER?

39. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO WRITE A KNOWLEDGE REPORT WHEN YOU KNEW OF AN OUT-ETHICS SITUATION THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN REPORTED?

40. HAVE YOU EVER FORBIDDEN OR PREVENTED ANOTHER FROM WRITING OR RELAYING A KNOWLEDGE REPORT?

41. HAVE YOU EVER MADE A PRACTICE OF FOLLOWING YOUR OWN OR OTHERS’ “SUCCESSFUL ACTIONS” RATHER THAN LEARNING AND APPLYING LRH POLICY EXACTLY?

42. HAVE YOU FAILED TO KEEP ABREAST OF OR IGNORED STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR YOUR AREA?

43. HAVE YOU DONE ANYTHING THAT CUT ACROSS STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR YOUR AREA?

44. HAVE YOU NEGLECTED OR CUT ACROSS CURRENT AND AUTHORIZED TACTICAL PLANNING OR PROGRAMS FOR YOUR AREA?

45. HAVE YOU EVER ATTEMPTED TO DIVERT ORG BUSINESS ELSEWHERE?

46. HAVE YOU EVER PUT OTHER-DYNAMIC CONSIDERATIONS BEFORE YOUR RESPONSIBILITIES AS A STAFF MEMBER OR EXEC?

47. HAVE YOU EVER USED ORG LINES, MATERIALS OR CONNECTIONS FOR PERSONAL BUSINESS?

48. HAVE YOU EVER PERVERTED THE INTENT OF A BONUS OR COMMISSION SYSTEM?

49. HAVE YOU EVER FAILED TO SEE THAT A PAID-FOR SERVICE WAS DELIVERED?

50. HAVE YOU BEEN INVOLVED IN ANY SORT OF FINANCIAL IRREGULARITY?

51. HAVE YOU EVER USED YOUR POSITION TO OBTAIN UNUSUAL FAVORS?

52. HAVE YOU EVER ENGAGED IN ANY SORT OF OUT-2D ACTIVITIES WITH PUBLIC STUDENTS OR PCs?

53. HAVE YOU EVER PERSISTED IN ANY 2D RELATIONSHIP THAT WAS POTENTIALLY HARMFUL TO THE ORGANIZATION?

54. HAVE YOU DONE ANYTHING ON THE 2D YOU HOPE WON’T BE FOUND OUT?

55. HAVE YOU USED DRUGS OR ALCOHOL TO EXCESS?

56. HAVE YOU CAUSED ANOTHER TO BECOME ADDICTED TO DRUGS OR ALCOHOL?

57. AFTER RECEIVING TRAINING OR PROCESSING HAVE YOU REVERTED TO DRUGS OR ALCOHOL?

58. HAVE YOU EVER ATTEMPTED TO SHIFT THE BLAME TO ANOTHER STAFF MEMBER OR EXEC FOR SOME OVERT YOU HAD COMMITTED?
(Once the act of attempting to shift the blame has been handled to EP with Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure, pull the actual overt the pc was attempting to shift the blame for and handle it with Steps A to G. Then recheck the original question, #58.)

59. HAVE YOU USED FALSE STATEMENTS OR “PR” TO COVER UP AN OVERT?
(Once the act of covering up the overt with false statements or “PR” has been handled to EP with Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure, pull the actual overt the pc was covering up and handle it with Steps A to G. Then recheck the original question, #59.)

60. HAVE YOU EVER FALSE REPORTED ABOUT SOMETHING?

61. HAVE YOU EVER FALSIFIED A STATISTIC?

62. HAVE YOU EVER STOLEN ANYTHING FROM A SCIENTOLOGY ORGANIZATION?

63. HAVE YOU EVER DAMAGED ORG PROPERTY?

64. HAVE YOU EVER ATTEMPTED TO DISCOURAGE ORG PCs OR STUDENTS FROM ADVANCING TO A HIGHER ORG?

65. HAVE YOU DONE SOMETHING THAT CUT THE DISSEMINATION LINES OF A SCIENTOLOGY ORG?

66. HAVE YOU ENCOURAGED, CONDONED OR IGNORED NONSTANDARD TECHNICAL DELIVERY?

67. HAVE YOU ENCOURAGED, CONDONED OR IGNORED LOW TECHNICAL QUALITY?

68. HAVE YOU ORIGINATED OR FORWARDED BLACK PR ABOUT STAFF MEMBERS OR SENIORS?
(Once the overt act of originating or spreading black PR has been handled to EP with Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure, get the prior overt the pc committed and handle with Steps A to G. Then check for and handle any other such overt. When these have been handled, recheck the original question, #68.)

69. HAVE YOU ORIGINATED OR FORWARDED BLACK PR ABOUT SCIENTOLOGY ORGANIZATIONS OR MANAGEMENT?
(Once the overt act of originating or spreading black PR has been handled to EP with Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure, get the prior overt the pc committed and handle with Steps A to G. Then check for and handle any other such overt. When these have been handled, recheck the original question, #69.)

70. HAVE YOU EVER ADVISED ANYONE AGAINST JOINING STAFF OF A SCIENTOLOGY ORG OR THE SEA ORG?

71. HAVE YOU MAINTAINED A CONNECTION TO A SUPPRESSIVE PERSON OR GROUP?

72. HAVE YOU EVER MADE FUN OF OR JOKED ABOUT YOUR OWN POST OR DUTIES?
(Once the overt act of joking or degrading has been handled to EP with Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure, get the prior overt the pc committed and handle with Steps A to G. Then check for and handle any other such overt. When these have been handled, recheck the original question, #72.)

73. HAVE YOU EVER MADE FUN OF OR JOKED ABOUT OTHER STAFF OR EXECS?
(Once the overt act of joking or degrading has been handled to EP with Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure, get the prior overt the pc committed and handle with Steps A to G. Then check for and handle any other such overt. When these have been handled, recheck the original question, #73.)

74. HAVE YOU EVER MADE FUN OF OR JOKED ABOUT LRH TECH OR POLICY?
(Once the overt act of joking or degrading has been handled to EP with Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure, get the prior overt the pc committed and handle with Steps A to G. Then check for and handle any other such overt. When these have been handled, recheck the original question, #74.)

75. HAVE YOU EVER PREVENTED A FELLOW STAFF MEMBER FROM WEARING HIS HAT?

76. HAVE YOU EVER PREVENTED ANOTHER FROM LEARNING HIS POST?

77. HAVE YOU EVER CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO AN ORG MUTINY?

78. HAVE YOU EVER WITHHELD THAT YOU WERE CONNECTED TO SOMEONE OR SOMETHING HOSTILE TO YOU?

79. HAVE YOU EVER WITHHELD THAT YOU WERE CONNECTED TO SOMEONE OR SOMETHING THAT DIDN’T AGREE WITH DIANETICS OR SCIENTOLOGY?

80. HAVE YOU EVER WITHHELD THAT YOU WERE ROLLER- COASTERING OR HAVING OTHER MANIFESTATIONS OF PTSness?

81. HAVE YOU COMMITTED AN OVERT ON LRH?

82. HAVE YOU HAD A WITHHOLD FROM LRH?

83. IS THERE SOME OTHER OVERT YOU HAVE COMMITTED THAT WOULD BE AWFUL TO HAVE TO GET OFF?

84. HAVE YOU CONTINUED TO COMMIT SOME OVERT OR TYPE OF OVERT ALREADY GOTTEN OFF?

SECTION II QUESTIONS:

85. DO YOU WANT A POST FOR SOME DESTRUCTIVE PURPOSE?

86. DO YOU WANT A POST TO DOMINATE OTHERS?

87. DO YOU SECRETLY WANT TO STOP THE ORGANIZATION?

88. ARE YOU AFRAID THE ORGANIZATION MIGHT GET TOO BIG?

89. DO YOU HAVE A DESTRUCTIVE INTENTION CONCERNING THE FUTURE OF SCIENTOLOGY?

90. HAVE YOU EVER INTENDED TO MAKE A GROUP FAIL?

91. HAVE YOU EVER INTENDED TO MAKE SCIENTOLOGY FAIL?

92. HAVE YOU EVER HAD AN INTENTION TO FAIL?

93. HAVE YOU HAD SOME PURPOSE WHICH IS IN OPPOSITION TO THE PURPOSE OF THIS ORG OR SCIENTOLOGY?

94. HAVE YOU EVER INTENDED TO TAKE SOMEONE’S MONEY FOR A SERVICE WITHOUT DELIVERING IT?

95. HAVE YOU EVER HAD A PURPOSE TO GET SOMETHING FOR NOTHING?

96. HAVE YOU EVER INTENDED TO GET AWAY WITH DOING AS LITTLE AS POSSIBLE?

97. DO YOU WANT A POST ONLY FOR PERSONAL GAIN?

98. DO YOU HAVE AN ULTERIOR MOTIVE FOR BEING ON STAFF?

99. DO YOU INTEND TO HARM SCIENTOLOGY DISSEMINATION?

100. HAVE YOU HAD A FEELING OF WANTING TO GET EVEN FOR SOMETHING?

101. HAVE YOU EVER WANTED TO HARM ANOTHER STAFF MEMBER?

102. DO YOU HAVE A SECRET DESIRE TO SEE SOMEONE FAIL?

END RUDS:

(Session withholds are handled with usual withhold rudiment procedure. Undisclosed overts missed in doing the questions on the list are handled with Steps A to G of False Purpose RD procedure.)

1. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU TOLD A HALF-TRUTH?

2. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU TOLD AN UNTRUTH?

3. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU SAID SOMETHING ONLY TO IMPRESS ME?

4. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU TRIED TO DAMAGE SOMEONE?

5. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU DELIBERATELY TRIED TO INFLUENCE THE E-METER?

6. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU SUCCESSFULLY WITHHELD SOMETHING?

7. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAVE YOU COVERED UP FOR SOMEONE ELSE?

8. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAS ANYONE SAID YOU HAD A WITHHOLD WHEN YOU DIDN’T HAVE ONE?

9. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAS ANYTHING BEEN ASSERTED?

10. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAS ANYTHING BEEN SUPPRESSED?

11. IN THIS CONFESSIONAL, HAS ANYTHING BEEN INVALIDATED?

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
Revision assisted by LRH Technical Research and Compilations

Hubbard, L. R. (1988, 4 May). Executive Posting Qualifications Form. The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology. (1991 ed., Vol. XII, pp. 327-36.). Los Angeles: Bridge Publications, Inc.

Notes