• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Suppressive Person Defense League

  • About SPDL
    • Legal and Disclaimer
  • Key documents: Suppressive Person Doctrine
  • Extremist Material
  • Fair Game Evidence
  • Writings
  • Glossary

January 1, 1975 by clerk Leave a Comment

Aberration

ABERRATION, 1. a departure from rational thought or behavior. From the Latin, aberrare, to wander from; Latin, ab, away, errare, to wander. It means basically to err, to make mistakes, or more specifically to have fixed ideas which are not true. The word is also used in its scientific sense. It means departure from a straight line. If a line should go from A to B, then if it is “aberrated” it would go from A to some other point, to some other point, to some other point, to some other point, to some other point and finally arrive at B. Taken in its scientific sense, it would also mean the lack of straightness or to see crookedly as, in example, a man sees a horse but thinks he sees an elephant. Aberrated conduct would be wrong conduct, or conduct not supported by reason. When a person has engrams, these tend to deflect what would be his normal ability to perceive truth and bring about an aberrated view of situations which then would cause an aberrated reaction to them. Aberration is opposed to sanity, which would be its opposite. (LRH Def. Notes) 2. an aberrated person wanders from his self-determined course. He no longer goes where he wants to go now, but goes where he has wanted to go in the past. His course is, therefore, not rational, and he seems to go wherever the environment pushes him. He has as many aberrations as he has hidden contrasurvival decisions in his past. (Abil 114A) 3. mental derangement, any irrational condition. (DMSMH, p. 102) 4. the aberree’s reactions to and difficulties with his current environment. (DTOT, p. 127) 5. the manifestation of an engram, and is serious only when it influences the competence of the individual in his environment. (Scn Jour 28-G) 6. the degree of residual plus or minus randomity accumulated by compelling, inhibiting or unwarranted assisting of efforts on the part of other organisms or the physical (material) universe. (Scn 0-8, p. 86)

Hubbard, L. R., (1975) Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary. Los Angeles: Church of Scientology of California Publications Organization.

Filed Under: Glossary Tagged With: Glossary

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Scientology's "Suppressive Person" mask

Transcript: The SP Doctrine on Trial

Footer

Recent Posts

  • More on the SP Doctrine: The Madness of King Davey
  • Twelve Characteristics, Eleven GO Felons (2019)
  • Speaking up for SPs to David Miscavige (2019)
  • SPDL: Speaking up for SPs (2019)
  • News: Scientology Cult Shut Down Over Shady Land-Grabbing Black Ops in Moscow

Tags

black propaganda chaos merchant criminals David Miscavige dead agent enemy Ethics evil purposes Fair game FDA FPRD Gerry Armstrong Glossary GO Intelligence Course government HFPRDA How to Confront and Shatter Suppression PTS/SP Course HSSC illness intelligence Interrogation L. Ron Hubbard legal Mary Sue Hubbard NCG OSA overts overts and withholds personnel requirements PR psychiatrists psychiatry psychosis PTS Rehabilitation Project Force rock slammers roller coaster RPF Russia scapegoating Scientology security Sea Org security checks SP Doctrine Suppressive Person

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Executive Pro (Edited on 1 June 2017) on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in