• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Suppressive Person Defense League

  • About SPDL
    • Legal and Disclaimer
  • Key documents: Suppressive Person Doctrine
  • Extremist Material
  • Fair Game Evidence
  • Writings
  • Glossary

February 16, 1969 by clerk Leave a Comment

HCOPL: Confidential Enemy Names

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 FEBRUARY 19691;2

Cen O Con
Guardians Offices
PROs
Intelligence

Confidential

ENEMY NAMES

(This is a Defense Paper written after 18 years of unprovoked attacks upon us. Nothing in this paper advocates physical violence to any person.)

By carefully watching press to see who is called upon by the press for counter-options one can work one’s way easily toward the centre of hostile network.

The press is fed anti materials. Although reporters do not disclose their sources, their stories often do.

To get a hostile opinion, the reporter looks in the files to see who is sending in hostile data and calls the person to comment. This is a training pattern developed from current “teachings” that all stories must have conflicts, a press style got some time by “Paris Match”. They think this is the basis of reader interest. It isn’t, but they think it is.

Thus by studying clippings you can find who has given them hostile data earlier or to whom they are referred for hostile data.

By taking these hostile names, one can then do a rundown on the person or his connections or both.

As there are actually very few of these names they thereby (cross filing) lead one to common denominators and one can locate attack sources.

It is wise to challenge such adverse commentators as routine procedures. A call by a local “housewives committee” etc. as to why they are hostile to human rights or in favour of psychiatric butchery and getting them in the press with it and with no mention of us is good PRO.

Intelligence data when gained, can be fed back to PRO for more spectacular confrontations.

Intelligence uses the names for investigation, run back, cross filing.

PRO uses the hostile confrontator to guide his own counter attacks.

The effect at the least is to shut the hostile people up.

This activity (investigate, press counter-attack such speakers) must not be neglected.

We happen to be fortunate, if you call it that, that persons hostile to Scientology usually have criminal backgrounds even when in public life. One doesn’t always find these even when they exist but one at least finds connections which are useful.

It is very sound strategy never to fight a battle on your own territory or subject or even on the territory of an ally. Always fight battles in enemy territory.

Therefore do exposes of such people in the area of their subjects or interests, not bringing us or any real ally into it.

For instance, all those years the enemies of Scientology had real dead bodies lying all over the place. But we defended on our own ground.

We have begun to fight on his terrain. Let’s keep it that way.

Use “counter opinion” names as investigation subjects, find their terrain, find the crimes on it and attack on that terrain and the enemy, not ourselves, will be in trouble.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:bw

Notes

  1. Document studied on Confidential GO Intelligence Course. PDF format. ↩
  2. Document studied on DSA Investigations Officer Full Hat. ↩

Filed Under: Extremist Directives, Fair Game Tagged With: enemy names, GO Intelligence Course, PRO, Scientology defense

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Scientology's "Suppressive Person" mask

Transcript: The SP Doctrine on Trial

Footer

Recent Posts

  • More on the SP Doctrine: The Madness of King Davey
  • Twelve Characteristics, Eleven GO Felons (2019)
  • Speaking up for SPs to David Miscavige (2019)
  • SPDL: Speaking up for SPs (2019)
  • News: Scientology Cult Shut Down Over Shady Land-Grabbing Black Ops in Moscow

Tags

black propaganda chaos merchant criminals David Miscavige dead agent enemy Ethics evil purposes Fair game FDA FPRD Gerry Armstrong Glossary GO Intelligence Course government HFPRDA How to Confront and Shatter Suppression PTS/SP Course HSSC illness intelligence Interrogation L. Ron Hubbard legal Mary Sue Hubbard NCG OSA overts overts and withholds personnel requirements PR psychiatrists psychiatry psychosis PTS Rehabilitation Project Force rock slammers roller coaster RPF Russia scapegoating Scientology security Sea Org security checks SP Doctrine Suppressive Person

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Executive Pro (Edited on 1 June 2017) on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in